As India’s bond market scales new heights, the role of the trustee is undergoing a quiet but critical transformation. No longer a passive custodian of documents, trustees today are expected to function as vigilant risk monitors and active defenders of investor interests. In a conversation with ET EDGE INSIGHTS, Pratapsingh Nathani, CMD of Beacon Trusteeship, reflects on how regulatory evolution, market complexity, and the retailisation of debt are reshaping trusteeship in India. Drawing on decades of experience across credit cycles, he explains why enforcement discipline, early intervention, and fiduciary responsibility are central to building confidence in India’s rapidly expanding fixed-income ecosystem.
What is Beacon, and what exactly does a Trustee do?
Beacon is India’s 1st & only listed, SEBI-licensed trustee operating as a Debenture trustee, Security trustee, AIF trustee and Escrow agent across more than 15 cities, including Mumbai and GIFT IFSC.
In any bond issuance, the trustee acts as an intermediary between the issuer and investors. When a company raises funds through bonds or debentures, it must create security of equivalent value and comply with defined covenants. The trustee ensures that security is legally perfected, documentation is compliant, interest payments are made on time and rating agencies are informed of any delays or defaults. If enforcement becomes necessary, the trustee is responsible for initiating recovery action on behalf of investors. Historically, trusteeship in India was viewed as largely procedural. In my view, it must function as a continuous risk-monitoring mechanism.
How did your career shape your approach to investor protection?
I began in the late 1990s selling non-convertible debentures to retail investors in Mumbai. That experience provided a direct understanding of how fixed-income products affect households. Subsequently, working in institutional debt and through the 2008 financial crisis, I observed how quickly credit assumptions can weaken under stress. Documentation that appears robust in normal conditions can develop gaps when liquidity tightens. Those experiences shaped my view that trustees must intervene early rather than merely document outcomes.
Why did you establish Beacon in 2015?
While working at ING as Head – DCM I came across two observations which became the basis for my foray into Trusteeship.
I had observed cases where earlier trustee intervention could have materially improved investor outcomes.
Second, the regulatory framework was evolving. Around 2014–2015, SEBI began strengthening expectations from debenture trustees, signalling a shift toward higher accountability & deepening the Indian Bond Markets.
I believed that trusteeship, if executed with discipline and credit awareness, could materially improve market confidence.
The Indian bond market is undergoing a structural shift. Where does the Trustee fit into this new architecture?
Historically, trusteeship was a “post-box” function—collecting documents and filing them away. Today, with the market hitting approximately ₹70 lakh crore annually, that model is obsolete.
At Beacon, we view ourselves as a risk-monitoring discipline rather than a mute spectator. In a bond issuance, we are the bridge between the issuer’s obligations and the investor’s expectations. From the regulator’s perspective, our job is to ensure security is not just “on paper” but legally perfected and enforceable. We don’t just wait for a default; we monitor the “pulse” of the credit.
You’ve often said that documentation that looks robust in “peacetime” fails during “wartime.” How has your career informed this skepticism?
I started in the late ’90s, selling Bonds to retail families. When you see a retiree or a pensioner’s hard earned savings on the line, your perspective on “covenant compliance” changes.
During the 2008 crisis, I saw “bulletproof” structures crumble because of liquidity gaps. This shaped the Beacon philosophy: Intervene early. If we wait for the rating agency to downgrade or the payment to fail, we’ve already lost the lead time required for recovery. Infact, we’ve created a covenant monitoring software for lenders & borrowers which is commercially available in the market.
When a default occurs, the Trustee moves from a monitor to an enforcement agent. How has the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) changed your roadmap?
The IBC has brought discipline, but it isn’t a magic wand. For a trustee, the battle begins before the NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal). We have to ensure that the security interest is correctly registered so that bondholders are treated as Secured Financial Creditors.
In several real estate mandates, we’ve seen financial positions deteriorate beyond recovery. In those cases, the trustee’s role is to lead the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and ensure that the resolution plan doesn’t disproportionately “haircut” the retail bondholders. We act as the aggressive advocate for the collective interest of investors who, individually, don’t have the legal muscle to fight large corporate debtors.
The Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) space is exploding. How does the role of a Trustee change in such complex, private structures?
In AIFs, the Trustee is the ultimate fiduciary. We aren’t just monitoring a bond; we are overseeing the Fund Manager’s adherence to the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). As AIFs move into distressed debt or venture debt, the Trustee must ensure that valuation norms and investment restrictions are strictly followed. It requires a much higher level of financial literacy than traditional debenture trusteeship.
Beacon is active in GIFT IFSC. How does trusteeship there differ from the domestic market?
GIFT City is our gateway to global standards. There, we act as a bridge for foreign capital entering India. The documentation follows international law (often English law), and the expectations for transparency are even higher. It’s a testing ground for the future of Indian trusteeship.
What is the single biggest threat to the Indian bond market today?
Enforcement speed. While the IBC and SARFAESI have improved things, the timeline for recovery—especially for retail bondholders in large-scale defaults—remains too long. We need a more streamlined mechanism for trustees to exercise security rights without getting bogged down in multi-year litigation. Trusteeship, in my view, must operate as an active risk oversight function, not merely as a documentation process.
Beacon has been active in the Municipal Bond segment. Why is this a critical area for trusteeship today?
Municipal bonds are the next frontier for deepening India’s debt market. When a city raises money for a water project or a bridge, the trustee’s role is unique. We aren’t just monitoring a corporate balance sheet; we are monitoring earmarked revenue streams—like property tax or water cess—that go into a “structured escrow.”
This requires a high degree of transparency to ensure that the city’s operational expenses don’t “leak” into the funds meant for bondholders. By providing this layer of trust, we help local bodies transition from government grants to market-based financing, which is essential for India’s urban transformation.
Does the “Retailization” of bonds change how you communicate as a Trustee?
Absolutely. Institutional investors have analysts; retail investors have us. As more individuals enter the bond market via platforms like OBPPs (Online Bond Platform Providers), the Trustee’s reports must be more intuitive and accessible. We are moving toward a world where a retail investor should be able to check the “health” of their bond’s collateral as easily as they check their stock portfolio.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of ET Edge Insights, its management, or its members.
Leave a comment