Authors
Cornis van der Lugt | S&P Global Sustainable1, ESG Research Senior Manager
Emily Podshadley | S&P Global Sustainable1, ESG Specialist
Lukas Zimmermann | S&P Global Sustainable1, Quantitative Modeling Analyst
Matt MacFarland | S&P Global Sustainable1, Thought Leadership Editor
The COVID-19 pandemic brought about new perspectives on the future of work and workplace best practices such as remote or flexible working hours. Initiatives with significant corporate support such as the World Wellbeing Movement have increasingly pushed to establish people wellbeing as a key performance indicator.
For decades, regulators have asked companies to report metrics related to human resources. But since the early 2000s, investors, management teams, employees and regulators have grown more interested in human capital, a term that recognizes the workforce as a major component of a company’s value and a key factor in creating competitive advantage. Human capital is a key intangible asset (IA) — defined in financial accounting standards as “an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance”— and accounting expectations have evolved to consider resources dedicated to human capital not only as expenses but also as critical investments. In its work on sustainability-related financial disclosures, the International Sustainability Standards Board is considering human capital as a priority project, addressing employee wellbeing, diversity and inclusion and workforce investment, among other topics.
Since the early 2000s, there has also been clear evidence that the market is placing greater significance on intangible assets, from intellectual property to brand power to internal and external relationships to corporate culture and tacit knowledge. This shift is signaled by the widening gap between the book value and market value of companies — a difference that is generally considered the measure of a company’s intangible assets.
To better understand the relationship between IAs and human capital management, in this analysis we calculate the IA intensity of companies in the 22 industry groups assessed in the 2022 S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) and focus on the eight industry groups with high IA intensity. Revenue generation in these industry groups especially benefits from innovating new products and bringing them to market — activities that rely on human capital. Using S&P Global ESG Scores raw data, which is based on the CSA, we explore whether these industry groups with high IA intensity appear to make talent management a priority.
Calculating intangible asset intensity
Our approach employs stock market prices, which reflect both physical and intangible asset value, and general accounting information. We measure total asset value as the sum of market value of equity, preferred equity and debt, then deduct the book value of current assets. We calculate IAs as the difference between total assets and physical assets. To measure IA intensity, we divide the value of IAs by the value of total assets.
Using this approach, we identified seven industry groups that displayed a level of IA intensity that is higher than a threshold of 50%. We then examined the way these industry groups invest in their human capital, using company assessments from the CSA related to their employee management practices and policies.
Our approach to calculating IA intensity provides the best comparability across industry groups. However, it also results in an underestimation of IA intensity for banks and financial services companies due to the unique structure of their balance sheets. We therefore include Financial Services as the eighth industry group.
The eight high IA intensity industry groups are:
-
Software & Services
-
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
-
Healthcare Equipment & Services
-
Household & Personal Products
-
Media & Entertainment
-
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
-
Commercial & Professional Services, and
-
Financial Services
We use the low IA intensity industry groups (below the 50% threshold) to provide a group average for different aspects of employee management and associated benefits. These 14 industry groups are: Automobiles & Components; Capital Goods; Consumer Durables & Apparel; Consumer Services; Energy; Food Products, Beverage & Tobacco; Food Beverage, Tobacco & Staples Retailing; Materials; Real Estate; Retailing; Technology Hardware & Equipment; Telecommunication Services; Transportation; and Utilities.
Leave a comment