Which Precious Metals ETF Is the Better Buy: iShares’ Gold Trust IAU or Silver Miners SLVP?

Comparing iShares Gold Trust (IAU +0.97%) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP +0.76%) highlights the significant differences between holding a physical commodity and investing in leveraged mining equities.

Both iShares funds target precious metals but utilize different investment vehicles. The Gold Trust tracks gold bullion directly, offering pure commodity exposure. The Silver and Metals Miners ETF invests in global mining companies, meaning its performance is tied to both silver prices and the operational success of the businesses themselves.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

iShares Gold Trust is the more affordable option with a 0.25% expense ratio compared to 0.39% for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF. Because the Gold Trust holds physical bullion rather than income-generating stocks, it does not offer a dividend yield.

Performance & risk comparison

iShares – iShares Msci Global Silver And Metals Miners ETF

Today’s Change

(0.76%) $0.28

Current Price

$37.38

Key Data Points

AUM

$941M

Dividend Yield

1.88%

Expense Ratio

0.39%

Top Holdings

HL

13.04%

PE&OLES.MX

10.81%

AG.TO

9.72%

What’s inside

iShares Gold Trust seeks to track the daily performance of the price of gold bullion by holding the physical metal in secured vaults. Its portfolio is classified as 100% cash and others because it does not hold corporate stocks. Since the fund tracks a single commodity, its largest position is Physical Gold at 100%, and it does not have a traditional list of diversified business holdings. The fund was launched in 2005.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF mirrors an index of global companies involved in the silver mining and exploration industry. Its portfolio contains 35 holdings, all of which are concentrated in the basic materials sector. Its largest positions include Hecla Mining (HL +1.91%) at 12.83%, Indust Penoles at 10.95%, and First Majestic Silver (AG +1.21%) at 9.71%. The fund was launched in 2012.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Today’s Change

(0.97%) $0.80

Current Price

$82.98

Key Data Points

AUM

$64B

Expense Ratio

0.25%

Which looks like the better buy

Gold and silver have both delivered historic gains in recent years, but the way you own precious metals matters as much as which metal you choose. IAU holds physical gold bullion in a vault, tracking gold’s spot price as directly as any investment can. When gold moves, IAU moves with it. Nothing more, nothing less.

SLVP is a completely different proposition. It holds stocks in global silver mining companies, which means you are not simply betting on silver prices. You are also betting on management quality, mining costs, geopolitical stability across multiple countries, and all the unpredictable forces that affect individual businesses. That layered exposure has driven extraordinary returns over three years, nearly doubling what IAU delivered over the same period.

IAU charges less than SLVP and carries a fraction of the volatility, making it the more dependable choice for investors who want precious metals as a portfolio stabilizer rather than a growth bet. SLVP’s mining stock structure means its upside can significantly exceed silver’s own gains during bull markets, and its losses can be equally amplified when conditions turn. For investors who understand that distinction and specifically want leveraged exposure to silver’s industrial and monetary demand story, SLVP is the more ambitious choice.